Small Population Breeds and Issues of Genetic Diversity
By Jerold S Bell, DVM, Tufts Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine
[Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy of information. However,
this is not a substitute for prompt veterinary care. This article
was originally published in the March 2007 AKC Perspectives' Delegates
Newsletter. Used here by permission. Published online at Sealyhealthguard.org,
11/23/11]
Download PDF version
Issues of genetic diversity are a concern to dog breeders, and this
can especially be so for breeds with small populations. The concern
is whether there is enough genetic variation within a breed's gene pool
to maintain health and vitality. Breeders should be concerned
about genetic diversity, because there are examples where damage has
been done to a breed due to breeding practices. Restriction of
genetic diversity can also occur in large population breeds.
All genes come in pairs: one from the sire and one from the dam. Each
gene in the pair is called an allele. If both alleles in a pair
are of the same type, the gene pair is homozygous. If the two
alleles are different, the gene pair is heterozygous. While each
dog can have a maximum of two different alleles at a gene pair, many
different alleles are potentially available to be part of the gene pair. The
greater the number of alleles that are available at each gene pair (called
genetic polymorphism), the greater the genetic diversity of the breed.
If there is no breed diversity in a gene pair, but the particular homozygous
gene that is present is not detrimental, there is no negative effect
on breed health. The characteristics that make a breed reproduce
true to its standard are, in fact, based on nonvariable (that is, homozygous)
gene pairs.
The origins of breeds have a lot to do with genetic diversity. A
breed established with a working phenotype tends to have diverse founder
origins, and significant diversity. Even with substantial population
bottlenecks, the breed can maintain considerable amounts of genetic diversity. This
was shown in a molecular genetic study of the Chinook breed, which was
reduced to 11 modern founders in 1981. Breeds established by inbreeding
on a limited number of related founder individuals could have reduced
diversity. Many breeds have also gone through diversity reducing
bottlenecks; such as occurred during World War II. For most of
these breeds, their gene pools have expanded through breeding for many
generations, resulting in a stable population of healthy dogs.
There are two factors that must be considered when evaluating genetic
diversity and health issues in a breed; the average level of inbreeding,
and detrimental recessive genes. With a small population, there
is a tendency to find higher average inbreeding coefficients due to the
relatedness between dogs from common ancestors. There is, however,
no specific level or percentage of inbreeding that causes impaired health
or vigor. The problems that inbreeding depression cause in purebred
populations stem from the effects of deleterious recessive genes. If
the founding population of a breed produces a high frequency of a deleterious
recessive gene, then the breed will have issues with that disorder. This
can be seen as smaller litter size, increased neonatal death, high frequency
genetic disease, or impaired immunity. If these issues are present
then the breed needs to seriously consider limited genetic diversity.
The issue of high average inbreeding coefficients is one that all breeds
go through during their foundation. As the population increases
and the average relatedness of dogs goes down (based on a fixed number
of generations), the average inbreeding coefficient for the breed will
go down. The effect of initially higher inbreeding coefficients
in small population breeds will depend on the presence of deleterious
recessive genes that will be expressed when homozygous.
Some breeders discourage linebreeding and promote outbreeding in an
attempt to protect genetic diversity in their breed. It is not
the type of matings utilized (linebreeding or outbreeding) that causes
the loss of genes from a breed gene pool. Rather, loss of genes
occurs through selection: the use and non-use of offspring. If
a breed starts narrowing their focus to breeding stock from a limited
number of lines, then a loss of genetic diversity will occur.
The process of maintaining healthy lines, with many breeders crossing
between lines and breeding back as they see fit, maintains diversity
in the gene pool. If some breeders outbreed, and some linebreed
to certain dogs that they favor while others linebreed to other dogs
that they favor, then breedwide genetic diversity is maintained. It
is the varied opinion of breeders as to what constitutes the ideal dog,
and their selection of breeding stock based on their opinions, that maintains
breed diversity.
The most important factor for diminished genetic diversity in dog breeds
is the popular sire syndrome. The overuse of a popular sire beyond
a reasonable contribution through frequent breedings significantly skews
the gene pool in his direction, and reduces the diversity of the gene
pool. Any genes that he possesses - whether positive or negative
- will increase in frequency. Through this founder's effect, breed-related
genetic disease can occur. Another insidious effect of the popular
sire syndrome is the loss of genetic contribution from quality, unrelated
males who are not used for breeding. There is a finite number
of quality bitches bred each year. If one male is used in an inordinate
amount of matings, there will be fewer females left for these quality
males that should be contributing to the gene pool. The popular
sire syndrome is a significant factor in both populous breeds and breeds
with small populations.
The best methods for ensuring the health and diversity of any breed's
gene pool are to: 1) Avoid the popular sire syndrome. 2) Utilize quality
dogs from the breadth of your population to expand the gene pool. 3)
Monitor genetic health issues through regular health surveys. 4)
Do genetic testing for breed-related disorders. 5) Participate
in open health registries, such as CHIC (www.caninehealthinfo.org) to
manage genetic disorders.
[Editor's note: The Sealyham Terrier open health registry is www.sealyhealthguard.org]
This article can be reprinted with the written permission from the author:
jerold.bell@tufts.edu